Von: Stefan
I veto with your claim on German law. The UrhG distinguishes Urheberrecht (creator’s right) and Verwertungsrecht (copyright). Copyright can be reassigned through contracts; this is how collecting...
View ArticleVon: Martin
I would not call that a “veto” to what I wrote, but more like a more precise explanation.
View ArticleVon: my 1 cent
With that CA one company, one distributor, one single person has full control. There is no guarantee that he doesn’t use that to go for his competitors by changing the license. Imagine a world where...
View ArticleVon: None
The concept of moral rights is not exclusive to civil law, and it exists in many common law jurisdictions (although it does not exist in the US). Moral rights are seperate from copyright, and represent...
View ArticleVon: Matthias
Very nice post, I completely agree with your opinion, and it looks like (if you look at the GNOME side too) that there is not a single FLOSS developer out there who thinks that project Harmony is...
View ArticleVon: Duncan
> E.g. I would sign the FSF CA and would also contribute to Qt as > the free software state is ensured by the KDE Free Qt Foundation. I agree with the post in general including the trust issue,...
View ArticleVon: Links 19/7/2011: Why GNU/Linux Feels Better Than Mac OS X, Howard County...
[...] Why I would not sign a Harmony Agreement Jos blog post today reminded me that I had a look at the Harmony Agreements and tried to decide for me whether I would consider to sign such a CA. To make...
View ArticleVon: Greg P
There is little doubt that one has to be prepared going into such negotiations. Part of the problem is the greed that permeates the development culture. Everyone, it seems, has the dream of creating...
View ArticleVon: Martin
Part of the problem is the greed that permeates the development culture. Everyone, it seems, has the dream of creating something wonderful, then selling it for some fortune, and being rich ever after I...
View Article
More Pages to Explore .....